Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02226
Original file (BC 2012 02226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02226 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational 
benefits to his son. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

In Jul 07, he retired with 20 years of service. 

 

He could not transfer his benefits unless he was on active duty 
in 2009. He would gladly have served his country for an 
additional two years to ensure his son would receive a quality 
education. 

 

His family is on a fixed income and he believed his son’s 
education was taken care of through the GI Bill. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 1 Jul 07, the applicant retired from military service. He 
served 20 years, 2 months and 8 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT notes the member retired 
effective 30 Jun 07 and the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) 
started on 1 Aug 09. Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 
3319(f)(1) states that “an individual…may transfer such 
entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces 
when the transfer is executed. 

 


The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 Jun 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 11 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02226: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 May 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 4 Jun 12. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03656

    Original file (BC 2012 03656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer an additional 18 months of Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his son. In this respect, while the record reflects the applicant was able to transfer half of the benefit to his eldest son prior to retirement, it...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03804

    Original file (BC 2013 03804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03804 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records to be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02142

    Original file (BC-2012-02142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02142 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040

    Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03688

    Original file (BC 2012 03688.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01462

    Original file (BC-2012-01462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Although he elected to retire prior to the effective date totransfer education benefits to his dependents under Post 9/11 GIBill he would like the opportunity to transfer his remainingbenefits to his son. The applicant has not provided anyevidence of an error or injustice by the Air Force. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03660

    Original file (BC-2012-03660.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Two days later, he completed actions to transfer half of his benefits to his daughter. The counseling notes reflect the applicant was “advised to monitor the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), and the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) website for updates and status.” Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319(f)(1) states “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00223

    Original file (BC-2012-00223.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Public Law states in part, that “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” Articles were published that explained the program benefits and requirements. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00223 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member All...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02603

    Original file (BC-2012-02603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had he known about the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) he would have postponed his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01878

    Original file (BC 2012 01878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-001878 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her educational benefits to her dependent son. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not told she could transfer her GI Bill to her dependents while she was on...